Download Rich Media, Poor Democracy: Communication Politics in by Robert W. McChesney PDF

By Robert W. McChesney

First released to nice acclaim in 2000, Rich Media, bad Democracy is Robert W. McChesney’s magnum opus. known as a “rich, penetrating learn” via Noam Chomsky, the publication is a meticulously researched exposition of the way U.S. media and conversation empires are threatening powerful democratic governance. What occurs whilst a couple of conglomerates dominate all significant features of mass media, from newspapers and magazines to radio and broadcast tv? because the book of this prescient paintings, which received Harvard’s Goldsmith booklet Prize and the Kappa Tau Alpha learn Award, the focus of media strength and the ensuing “hypercommercialization of tradition” has simply intensified.

McChesney lays out his imaginative and prescient for what a really democratic society may appear like, providing compelling feedback for a way the media will be reformed as a part of a broader application of democratic renewal. Rich Media, terrible Democracy continues to be as very important and insightful as ever and keeps to function a major source for researchers, scholars, and somebody who has a stake within the transformation of our electronic commons.

This re-creation incorporates a significant new preface via McChesney, the place he deals either a background of the transformation in media because the publication first seemed; a sweeping account of the geared up efforts to reform the media method; and the continued threats to our democracy as journalism has endured its sharp decline.

Show description

Read or Download Rich Media, Poor Democracy: Communication Politics in Dubious Times PDF

Best communication & media studies books

Poisoning the Press: Richard Nixon, Jack Anderson, and the Rise of Washington's Scandal Culture

From Publishers Weekly Feldstein, an award-winning journalist and professor on the college of Maryland, chronicles the arguable careers of 2 iconic figures, former president Richard Nixon and the investigative mentioned he feared most--Jack Anderson. With the astute research of a psychotherapist, Feldstein exhibits how the emotional and spiritual strengths, or flaws, of Nixon, the over-ambitious Quaker baby-kisser, and Anderson, the pious Mormon scribe, play out in a three-decade-long video game to win over American public opinion.

Mind Control in the United States

"The most advantageous solution to provide yourself with protection from unconscious manipulation is through being conscious of the way it works," states writer Steven Jacobson. And with large documentation, Mr. Jabobson takes us on a trip of the multi-faceted measurement of brain keep watch over and exhibits us the right way to shop our brain and soul from the brain manipulators.

The Demon of Writing: Powers and Failures of Paperwork

Because the center of the eighteenth century, political thinkers of all kinds--radical and reactionary, expert and amateur--have been complaining approximately "bureaucracy. " yet what, precisely, are they complaining approximately? within the Demon of Writing, Ben Kafka deals a severe heritage and thought of 1 of the main ubiquitous, least understood types of media: bureaucracy.

Rich Media, Poor Democracy: Communication Politics in Dubious Times

First released to nice acclaim in 2000, wealthy Media, terrible Democracy is Robert W. McChesney’s magnum opus. referred to as a “rich, penetrating examine” by means of Noam Chomsky, the booklet is a meticulously researched exposition of the way U. S. media and verbal exchange empires are threatening potent democratic governance.

Additional resources for Rich Media, Poor Democracy: Communication Politics in Dubious Times

Sample text

Professional journalism, although it has its advantages, is hardly neutral; it was a response to — and an abettor of — the monopolization of commercial news media, especially newspapers. In particular, professional coverage of politics as it evolved in the United States under commercial auspices tends to be stenography to those in power, where elites pick the topics and set the range of legitimate debate. Even at its peak, say in the 1970s, it was problematic. , its independence from overt commercial interference, its commitment to actually covering a community, its emphasis upon factual accuracy — was disintegrating under commercial pressure from the corporate news media system as it became an area for massive profitability.

At present the smart money says that the big guys will win and the wise move is to accept the inevitable and abandon any hope of social change. But the same smart money once said communism was going to last forever unless overthrown from without, and that South African apartheid could never be removed peacefully so it was best to work with the status quo white regime. Smart money is often more interested in protecting money than in being smart. Nobody can predict the future, especially in turbulent times like these.

As Ben Scott, who ran Free Press’s Washington office at the time, put it: “The idea was that Free Press would have experts in Washington who could PREFACE TO THE 2015 EDITION xlv go toe-to-toe with the corporate lawyers, but we also could organize millions of people to support our proposals for more democratic policy. ” 11 Free Press absolutely boomed in the five years following its creation, growing to have a staff of a few dozen and an effective e-list of 600,000 people. ) Free Press worked with progressive FCC members such as Michael Copps to hold several dozen town meetings across the country on media policy issues, which often attracted hundreds of people and long conversations on media that sometimes went deep into the night.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.28 of 5 – based on 43 votes