Download Judicial Decision Making, Sentencing Policy, and Numerical by Austin Lovegrove PDF

By Austin Lovegrove

This publication describes an unique, empirical research of judicial selection making. the method of picking out sentences is a tricky one for judges and infrequently unnecessarily intuitive, subjective, and intricate. the current learn introduces a conceptual define and empirical approach for expanding the precision of sentencing coverage, hence delivering an reduction to judges who sentence within the mild of this coverage. the first objective of this version of judicial selection making is to supply a framework for scaling the seriousness of any unmarried case in terms of the proof of that case and for touching on this overview to the suitable quantum of sentence. The validity of the version is proven and cross-validated in an archival research. This cutting edge examine serves as an enormous prototype for a method of numerical information to judges and sentencers.

Show description

Read or Download Judicial Decision Making, Sentencing Policy, and Numerical Guidance PDF

Similar criminal law books

Conscience and Convenience: The Asylum and Its Alternatives in Progressive America (New Lines in Criminology)

During this up-to-date re-creation, Rothman chronicles and examines incarceration of the legal, the deviant, and the based in U. S. society, with a spotlight on how and why those equipment have continued and multiplied for over a century and a part, regardless of longstanding facts in their mess ups and abuses.

The Social Contexts of Criminal Sentencing

Traditionally, the declaration and invocation of felony consequences have been public spectacles. this day, worry of crime and disaffection with the felony justice approach ensure that this public fascination with punishment keeps. some time past decade, almost each legislature within the kingdom has undertaken sentencing reform, within the wish that public drawback with crime will be allayed and dispari­ ties in legal sentences will be diminished if no longer eradicated.

Corrective Justice

Inner most legislation governs our so much pervasive relationships with folks: the wrongs we do to each other, the valuables we personal and exclude from others' use, the contracts we make and holiday, and the advantages discovered at another's price that we can't justly preserve. the foremost ideas of personal legislation are popular, yet how they're prepared, defined, and justified is an issue of fierce debate through legal professionals, economists, and philosophers.

Additional info for Judicial Decision Making, Sentencing Policy, and Numerical Guidance

Sample text

Clearly, this proposal would leave the courts with the sort of decisions to which Ashworth's contribution is directed. Indeed, Ashworth (1987) noted that the practical difficulties associated with developing the elaborate framework required for numerical precision led von Hirsch (1981), in his attempt to translate aspects of penal policy into penalty, to propose (or at least apparently approve of) a rather crude weighti'1g to take some account of variation in the seriousness of various prior convictions.

This innovation has been introduced recently into some appellate courts in Canada, according to the Canadian Sentencing Commission (1987). These have taken various forms, including differentiating offenses within broad statutory offense classifications, setting starting points for tariffs, and listing material offense and offender characteristics. One appellate court has echoed the "uniformity of approach" sentiment. Nevertheless, there are few such cases. In the survey of Canadian judges, 59% thought that appellate guideline judgments would reduce disparity (Canadian Sentencing Commission, 1987).

Wilkins's disregard of the significance of the first element of the sentencing judgment is one manifestation of this omission; a second is his adoption of inappropriate modeling techniques to represent the relationship between the facts of a case and sentence. Alternatively, it may be said Wilkins saw the problem of describing sentencing policy as involving no more than accounting for, in terms of a correlational (predictive) paradigm, the relationship between case facts and sentence. If the first element of the sentencing judgment - deliberations about the punitive process-is ignored, then the sentencing process will become impoverished in a number of significant ways.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.64 of 5 – based on 5 votes