By John M. Polimeni, Visit Amazon's Kozo Mayumi Page, search results, Learn about Author Central, Kozo Mayumi, , Mario Giampietro, Blake Alcott
�The Jevons Paradox�, which used to be first expressed in 1865 through William Stanley Jevons when it comes to use of coal, states that a rise in potency in utilizing a source results in elevated use of that source instead of to a discount. This has consequently been proved to use not only to fossil fuels, yet different source use situations. for instance, doubling the potency of meals construction in step with hectare during the last 50 years (due to the golf green Revolution) didn't clear up the matter of starvation. the rise in potency elevated creation and worsened starvation as a result of the ensuing raise in inhabitants. the results of this in today�s international are gigantic. Many scientists and policymakers argue that destiny technological thoughts will decrease intake of assets; the Jevons Paradox explains why this can be a fake desire. this is often the 1st ebook to supply a historic evaluation of the Jevons Paradox, supply proof for its lifestyles and use it on advanced structures. Written and edited via international specialists within the fields of economics, ecological economics, expertise and the surroundings, it explains the parable of potency and explores its implications for source utilization (particularly oil). it's a must-read for policymakers, traditional source managers, lecturers and scholars focused on the consequences of potency on source use.
Read Online or Download Jevons' Paradox and the Myth of Resource Efficiency Improvements (Earthscan Research Editions) PDF
Best oil & energy books
More and more, the focal point of danger administration isn't just on minimizing the adverse effects of doubtful occasions, yet on actually delivering aggressive virtue. notwithstanding, neither threats nor possibilities will be successfully pointed out and assessed with no high quality marketplace intelligence. As businesses more and more combine their company possibility, approach and finance judgements, they're discovering that company danger id and evaluate is simply pretty much as good because the info of their process.
This publication explores the fiscal demanding situations fascinated with coping with hydrocarbon wealth in the Caspian zone, and appears at how to design an optimal strength coverage. The publication draws on the Author's event in facing the governments of the area, and her knowledge of the role of significant businesses within the quarter.
- Carbon Shift: How Peak Oil and the Climate Crisis Will Change Canada (and Our Lives)
- Policy-Making in a Transformative State: The Case of Qatar
- Powering Europe: Russia, Ukraine, and the Energy Squeeze
- Lithium-Ion Batteries Hazard and Use Assessment
- The Global Oil & Gas Industry: Management, Strategy and Finance
- Livable cities for the 21st century
Additional info for Jevons' Paradox and the Myth of Resource Efficiency Improvements (Earthscan Research Editions)
Their ‘becoming more expensive articles’, they ‘augment … national capital … with advantage to society’ and are ‘preferred by good economists’ (p21). The relevance of the (energy) costs of energy efficiency to rebound is disputed. 27 Rae also distinguishes between ‘efficiently’ and ‘effectually’ (in the sense of merely getting a job well done), as when the threshing machine not only saves labour but separates grain better than the flail method (p20). This again raises the question of the changing quality of the output in our numerator.
Criticizing his predecessors in all but name, Mill concludes that ‘All commodities may rise in their money price. But there cannot be a general rise of values’ (p459). Mill has a point. If, as Malthus somewhat circularly said, ‘exchangeable value is the relation of one object to some other or others in exchange’ (p51), then the concept of exchange is of no use in analysing the growth of wealth. And to the extent that prices are an abstract proxy for millions of exchange values, monetary concepts are likewise perhaps inapplicable.
Say said that although lower input and greater output are mathematically ‘the same thing’, both are ‘sure to be followed by an enlargement of the product’; for both producers and consumers ‘every thing saved is so much gain’ (pp301 and 357). qxd 28 11/26/2007 5:48 PM Page 28 THE JEVONS PARADOX AND THE MYTH OF RESOURCE EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENTS and make ‘larger returns’, ‘supplies’, ‘absolute capital and stock’, ‘revenue’ and ‘supply for future wants’ (pp67 and 258–260; see also Brewer, 1991). For him the ‘effective desire of accumulation’ was necessary but not sufficient for the ‘increase of stock and capital’, which also required ‘augmentation’, that part of growth occurring ‘through the operation of the principle of invention’ (pp205–209 and 264 and Chapters VI and VII; see also Malthus, p339).