By Pupul Jayakar
Read or Download Fire in the mind: Dialogues with J. Krishnamurti PDF
Best religion & spirituality books
This ebook offers a sustained, severe and theological engagement with arguably the main an important element of latest society - its range. the writer unearths within the social thought of Isaiah Berlin a couple of fruitful how one can reframe the controversy over those questions, and to give a contribution to a extra optimistic dialog concerning our basic variations.
A piece that's exact sufficient for scientists and easy adequate for fans of 'ghost tales. ' On a thread of conception and dialogue Dr. Mason hyperlinks many startling examples from his personal expert event and from the court cases of the Society for Psychical study. "Certain to draw broad recognition.
Agni is the Lord of fireplace. Agni Yoga is the yoga of synthesis. the elemental premise of Agni Yoga is that this: There are not any exterior conditions that could defeat the human spirit. This publication is concentrated in the direction of those that have a few familiarity with the Trans-Himalayan teachings. however the key lies of their useful software.
"What is politization? . . . (It is that) all difficulties have, in our time, develop into political" -J. Ellul, from the advent Jacques Ellul, the writer of The Technological Society and Propaganda, the following examines glossy man's ardour for politics, the jobs he performs in them, and his position within the smooth nation.
- The Mormon Presence in Canada
- The Handbook of Contemporary Animism
- Qabalah of 50 Gates
- To Will and To Do
Additional info for Fire in the mind: Dialogues with J. Krishnamurti
Pause) Is there a total negation or is it always partial? Do you follow what I mean? Do I negate attachment, then negate jealousy, then negate all the hurt, and so on? You see, that way is endless. Right? PJ: Yes. K: So, is there a total negation of disorder? (Pause) Q: Sir, you are speaking of an action—but that ‘action’ cannot be a movement, because movement implies time. K: Yes, I know, but I just used that word. I used that word—I can use any word—to imply a negation of disorder which does not entail a wanting of order, which does not have a movement towards order.
So, what will? Let’s discuss it; let’s go into it. PJ: That is why I say, sir, that there is only one instrument that you leave free. That is, you allow only one instrument the possibility of being free of taint. K: The senses? PJ: Yes, the senses. You have blocked every other instrument... 36 K: Yes, we have blocked every hole that the human mind has invented. Have we also blocked the senses? PJ: I see that when the senses identified with thought operate, they only strengthen the structure which is the basic cause of confusion.
PJ: Well, remove the word ‘individual’. But experience, confusion, chaos, anxiety, fear, anger—when you talk of the total fact of life... K: No, no. My point is: Can thought be aware of the totality of consciousness? That’s what we said. PJ: And we said that it cannot be aware. K: Yes, it cannot be. So, now, what is the question you are raising? PJ: You see, this has come about because we raised the initial question of what the distinction between consciousness, the mind, the brain and thought is.